Advanced Technology Bipod Review

The Advanced Technology Bipod Made a Bold First Impression

The allure of a steady shot, especially with a rifle like the SKS known for its historical significance and robust design, is undeniable. When I saw the Advanced Technology Bipod, specifically the SKS Featherweight Non-Swivel model, advertised at such an affordable price, I was cautiously optimistic. Could this sub-$30 bipod truly enhance the SKS’s accuracy and stability without adding significant weight or bulk?

I was looking for an affordable, lightweight bipod that would provide added stability for my SKS at the range. The low price point and the promise of easy installation via the bayonet lug were the primary draws. The claim of being made in the U.S.A. also initially swayed me.

Upon receiving the product, my initial enthusiasm waned considerably. The extremely lightweight nature of the Advanced Technology Bipod wasn’t a testament to clever design, but rather a consequence of the flimsy, cheap-feeling plastic used in its construction. The “Snap-N-Lock” button felt far from secure, and the overall build quality screamed of cost-cutting measures.

Compared to other bipods I’ve used, like the Harris bipods on my AR-15 rifles and even a basic Caldwell bipod on my hunting rifle, the Advanced Technology Bipod felt incredibly inadequate. I chose this particular bipod initially due to the advertised ease of mounting on the SKS bayonet lug and its low cost. The other bipods I own require mounting to a Picatinny rail or swivel stud.

My first impression was one of profound disappointment. The Advanced Technology Bipod felt like a toy rather than a functional accessory for a firearm. The initial excitement quickly turned to concern about its ability to withstand even minimal recoil, let alone improve my shooting experience.

Real-World Testing: Putting Advanced Technology Bipod to the Test

First Use Experience

My first attempt to use the Advanced Technology Bipod was at an outdoor shooting range on a clear, dry day. I mounted the bipod onto the bayonet lug of my SKS, which, to its credit, was a straightforward process. However, the instability was immediately apparent.

The bipod struggled to support the weight of the SKS, even without a magazine inserted. The legs flexed noticeably, and the “Snap-N-Lock” mechanism felt far from secure, allowing the legs to shift and wobble. Any attempts to acquire a stable sight picture were undermined by the bipod’s inherent instability.

The Advanced Technology Bipod immediately exhibited issues. Recoil caused the legs to fold and the entire setup felt unsecure and unreliable. Even minor adjustments resulted in the bipod shifting and losing its position.

Extended Use & Reliability

After a few range sessions, the Advanced Technology Bipod‘s already questionable reliability deteriorated further. The plastic construction showed signs of stress, with slight cracking around the pivot points. The non-slip rubber feet provided minimal grip on various surfaces, including concrete and dirt.

The durability of the Advanced Technology Bipod is practically nonexistent. The plastic construction makes it prone to breaking. Cleaning is simple, but only because there’s so little to the bipod, to begin with.

Compared to my previous experiences with more robust bipods, the Advanced Technology Bipod proved to be a complete disappointment. It failed to provide the stability and support necessary for accurate shooting. The other bipods I’ve used inspire confidence.

Breaking Down the Features of Advanced Technology Bipod

Specifications

The Advanced Technology Bipod, specifically the SKS Featherweight Non-Swivel model, boasts the following specifications:

• Mounting System: Attaches to the SKS bayonet lug.
• Adjustable Height: Extends from 9″ to 13″.
• Weight: Approximately 6 ounces.
• Material: Weatherproof plastic.
• Leg Adjustment: “Snap-N-Lock” button for folding legs forward, rearward, or downward.
• Feet: Non-slip rubber feet.
• Origin: Made in the U.S.A. (though the materials used cast doubt on the value of this claim).

These specifications, at first glance, suggest a lightweight and versatile bipod. However, the reality is that the choice of cheap plastic undermines the potential benefits of the design. The “Weatherproof Plastic” is not sufficient.

Performance & Functionality

The Advanced Technology Bipod fails to perform its primary function: providing stable support for accurate shooting. The flimsy construction and insecure locking mechanism make it virtually useless for anything beyond very casual plinking. The accuracy of the firearm decreases with the bipod installed.

The strengths are limited to its lightweight nature and ease of attachment. The Advanced Technology Bipod‘s weaknesses are its instability, poor durability, and lack of a secure locking mechanism. This product falls far short of expectations.

Design & Ergonomics

The design of the Advanced Technology Bipod is simple and straightforward, aiming for ease of use and lightweight portability. However, the choice of materials compromises the overall build quality and feel. The overall weight is not as important as stability.

The bipod’s user-friendliness is questionable. The “Snap-N-Lock” button is awkward to operate, and the lack of swivel or cant adjustment limits its versatility. There is a learning curve associated with operating the locking mechanism.

Durability & Maintenance

The Advanced Technology Bipod‘s durability is a significant concern. The plastic construction is prone to cracking and breaking under even moderate stress. Maintenance is minimal, requiring only occasional cleaning with a damp cloth.

Given the fragile nature of the materials, I doubt the Advanced Technology Bipod will last more than a few range sessions before succumbing to wear and tear. Repairing it would be difficult, if not impossible, given its plastic construction. The bipod is not made to be repaired.

Accessories and Customization Options

The Advanced Technology Bipod comes with minimal accessories. There are no customization options available. Due to its specific design for the SKS bayonet lug, it is unlikely to be compatible with aftermarket accessories.

Pros and Cons of Advanced Technology Bipod

Check Best Price HERE

Who Should Buy Advanced Technology Bipod?

The Advanced Technology Bipod might appeal to individuals on an extremely tight budget who are looking for a very lightweight and easily attachable bipod for casual plinking with their SKS. However, even for casual use, its instability and lack of durability make it a poor choice. Those concerned with accuracy should use a different bipod.

Anyone serious about shooting, hunting, or tactical applications should avoid this product. The minimal stability provided does not justify its purchase. A more robust and reliable bipod is necessary for these activities.

There are no must-have accessories or modifications that can significantly improve the Advanced Technology Bipod‘s performance. Any money spent on trying to enhance it would be better spent on purchasing a higher-quality alternative.

Conclusion on Advanced Technology Bipod

In summary, the Advanced Technology Bipod for the SKS is a deeply disappointing product. While the low price point and lightweight design might seem attractive at first, the flimsy construction and lack of stability make it virtually useless for any serious shooting application. The Advanced Technology Bipod‘s price point is too high for what the buyer receives.

The value proposition is simply not there. The price is low, but the performance is even lower. It’s a classic case of “you get what you pay for.”

I would not recommend the Advanced Technology Bipod to anyone seeking a reliable and effective bipod for their SKS. Save your money and invest in a higher-quality option that will actually improve your shooting experience. Look elsewhere if you want quality.

Check Best Price HERE