The Heller Court made clear that the Second Amendment right it recognized did not include possession of weapons by certain categories of individuals, or possession of weapons in certain places, or possession of certain types of weapons. The Court specifically discussed the types of weapons that were not protected by the Second Amendment in distinguishing the Miller case.

The conclusion that the Heller Court did not extend Second Amendment protection to machine guns,the Eighth Circuit held that the defendant’s possession of a machine gun was not protected by the Second Amendment under Heller: “Machine guns are not in common use by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes and therefore fall within the category of dangerous and unusual weapons that the government can prohibit for individual use.

Sebastian from the Snowflakes in Hell-blog opinion on the subject is:

This is why I don’t jump on board in support when people do stupid things that end screwing the rest of us.  This is a prime example of that in action.

What can i say, he is right.

Add your own comment...

The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 Gun Values Board